EDIT: As Strongbad points out in a comment the term Awaiting Editors Decision strictly indicates that the paper has passed reviewers. The Journals and Editorial press office distributes embargoed mailings highlighting upcoming content to registered journalists six days in advance of publication. Reviewers will assess the technical soundness and scientific validity of your methods, analysis and interpretation, all of which must be appropriate, properly conducted, ethically robust and fully supported by the data. PRX editors make every effort to arrive at a clear decision on the disposition of a manuscript within a reasonable time. Hopefully, the exact situation will become clear with the next status update. How do I get published in Nature or Science? March 1, 2023 - As we approach, on March 14, its 12-year anniversary, now is as good a time as any to reflect on Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") Rule 206 (4)-5 (the "Pay-to-Play Rule . Nature is reluctant to consult new referees unless there is a particular, relevant area of scientific expertise that was lacking in the referees already used. ISSN 0028-0836 (print), report original scientific research (the main results and conclusions must not have been published or submitted elsewhere). Obviously, the most difficult situations are those in which the reviewers arrive at nearly or . You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. See this document for a full description of what happens after acceptance and before publication. The first stage for a newly submitted Article is that the editorial staff consider whether to send it for peer-review. Register for comprehensive research tips and expert advice on English writing, journal publishing, good publication practices, trends in publishing, and a lot more. :-). Icons made by various authors from www.flaticon.com, Experiential Live Edit: How to improve Biomed manuscripts. This website is using a security service to protect itself from online attacks. If your article is accepted, it could take anywhere from a few months to three years for the journal to publish your piece. What does the distribution of wait times for a editor decision look like for a manuscript submitted to Science or Nature? Journalists have embargoedaccess to papers via the Nature Research press site, and are permitted to show papers to independent specialists a few days in advance of publication, under embargo conditions, solely for the purpose of eliciting comment on the work described. Hence, Nature prefers to stick with the original referees of a particular paper rather than to call in new referees to arbitrate, unless there is some specific way in which the referee can be shown to be technically lacking or biased in judgement. Share your stories! The Editor-in-Chief (EiC) makes the final decision on manuscript, with the associate editor (AE) making the initial decision. volume5,page 917 (2002)Cite this article. Although we hope that the peer review files will provide a detailed and useful view into our peer review process, it is important to note that these files will not contain all the information considered in the editorial decision making process, such as the discussions between editors, editorial decision letters, or any confidential comments made by reviewers or authors to the editors. Editage Insights offers a wealth of free academic research and publishing resources and is a one-stop guide for authors and others involved in scholarly publishing. The corresponding (or other single designated) author is responsible on behalf of all co-authors for the accuracy of all content, including spelling of names and current affiliations of all co-authors, so please ensure these are checked carefully. Although many decisions appear clear-cut, others are necessarily based on subtle distinctions between papers, and referees or editors can sometimes make mistakes. In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles ISSN 1476-4687 (online) Answer (1 of 4): Hi! Hello. We may reverse decisions in cases where a referee (or editor) has made a serious error of fact, but only if the error was crucial to the decision. What does a quick change from 'Under consideration' to 'Decision made' back to 'Under consideration' mean for Nature? Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? Once the decision has been made to peer-review the paper, the choice of referees is made by the editor who has been assigned the manuscript, who will be handling other papers in the same field, in consultation with editors handling submissions in related fields when necessary. [CDATA[> So dont feel upset! Will contact my PI if it doesn't change to "decision sent to author" in the next few days. Decision in progress means all the reviews have already been received and whats left is for the editor to make a decision. Dont infer anything from unavailable data. Is there a proper earth ground point in this switch box? It has core editorial offices across the United States, continental Europe, and Asia under the international scientific publishing company Springer Nature. A vital, and often overlooked, aspect of peer review is that in the current system, peer reviewers are normally not paid for their work. @Fomite so you still said gamma with just 1 parameter What is the other? Site design / logo 2023 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under CC BY-SA. 172.104.52.81 The main editor is usually quite quick (a couple of days or so) because their just gauging scope and relavence. But in June 2022, the journal was removed from SCI indexing, what can i do, so much of work in it with two revsions taking more than a year,what can be done, Why is a PhD essential to become a peer-reviewer. Can airtags be tracked from an iMac desktop, with no iPhone? Until then, you may find it worthwhile to go through the following resources about journal statuses: Answered by Irfan Syed Usually, the times vary from two to six months, but there is no fixed rule. My code is GPL licensed, can I issue a license to have my code be distributed in a specific MIT licensed project. You could ask how soon they think they will answer, or give a deadline yourself, warning them that, after that deadline without having heard, you will submit the text to another publisher. These are very political journals. Subscribe and get curated content that will give impetus to your research paper. If both reviewers give negative recommendations, it is much less likely for the editor to accept a paper. The process was on par with other journal experiences, but I do not appreciate the inconsistency between what the editor at Nature Medicine told me when transferring to Nature Comms, and the final evaluation at Nature Comms. In [i] we find started associated with past time in [a] but with future time in [b], as indicated by the temporal modifiers yesterday and tomorrow respectively. Read Editage Insights in your favorite RSS Reader. Most journals typically take around 4-12 weeks to share their final decision. //-->